Back to Home

Critique of "Darwin's Black Box"

Michael Behe's "Darwin's Black Box" (1996) argues for intelligent design, claiming that certain biological systems are "irreducibly complex" and therefore could not have evolved through natural selection. This page presents a rebuttal to Behe's main arguments.

Irreducible Complexity

Behe's central argument revolves around the concept of "irreducible complexity," which he defines as:

"A single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning."
Michael Behe, Darwin's Black Box (1996)

This concept is not scientifically viable for a number of reasons:

The Bacterial Flagellum

Behe presents the bacterial flagellum as a prime example of irreducible complexity. However, extensive research contradicts this claim:

"There is no single, uniform bacterial flagellum. There are many variants on the theme, and many bacteria have flagella that are missing one or more components of the 'standard' flagellum. Bacteria can swim perfectly well without many of these components."
Kenneth R. Miller, "The Flagellum Unspun" in Debating Design (2004)

Research has shown that the bacterial flagellum likely evolved from simpler systems:

Moreover, the evolution of the flagellum can be explained through well-understood evolutionary processes:

These findings demonstrate that the bacterial flagellum, far from being irreducibly complex, has a plausible evolutionary pathway supported by genetic, structural, and comparative evidence.

Blood Clotting Cascade

Another system Behe claims is irreducibly complex is the blood clotting cascade. However, extensive research contradicts this claim. Studies have shown that the blood clotting system has evolved through a series of gene duplications and modifications.

"The vertebrate blood clotting cascade is a step-by-step modification of a much simpler system... found in invertebrates."
Russell F. Doolittle, "The evolution of vertebrate blood coagulation" (2009)

These findings contradict Behe's claim of irreducible complexity, demonstrating instead a gradual, evolutionary pathway for the blood clotting cascade.

Scientific Consensus

The scientific community has overwhelmingly rejected Behe's arguments:

"In Darwin's Black Box, Behe has given us a masterful remake of the Watchmaker argument... updated to account for the molecular nature of life. Unfortunately, like its predecessors, it fails to deal with the central issue of evolution."
H. Allen Orr, "Darwin v. Intelligent Design (Again)" (1996)

Moreover, in the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial, Behe's ideas were thoroughly examined and rejected:

"We therefore find that Professor Behe's claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large."
Judge John E. Jones III, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005)

Conclusion

While Behe's work has stimulated discussion, it has not withstood scientific scrutiny. The concept of irreducible complexity fails to account for known evolutionary mechanisms and ignores substantial evidence for the evolution of complex systems. As such, "Darwin's Black Box" does not present a credible challenge to the theory of evolution by natural selection.